Prevalence of faecal incontinence and its related factors among patients in a Malaysian academic setting
© Roslani et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 18 January 2013
Accepted: 7 May 2014
Published: 18 May 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|18 Jan 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rick Nelson|
|14 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - massimo bellini|
|9 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - April Camilla Roslani|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 May 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - massimo bellini|
|6 May 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rick Nelson|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|7 May 2014||Editorially accepted|
|18 May 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-230X-14-95|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.