Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Prevalence of faecal incontinence and its related factors among patients in a Malaysian academic setting

  • April C Roslani1Email author,
  • Rajeshwary Ramakrishnan1,
  • Soraya Azmi2, 3,
  • Daryl J Arapoc3 and
  • Adrian Goh2, 3
BMC Gastroenterology201414:95

DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-95

Received: 18 January 2013

Accepted: 7 May 2014

Published: 18 May 2014

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
18 Jan 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rick Nelson
14 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - massimo bellini
9 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - April Camilla Roslani
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 May 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - massimo bellini
6 May 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rick Nelson
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
7 May 2014 Editorially accepted
18 May 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-230X-14-95

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Surgery, University of Malaya Medical Centre
Azmi Burhani Consulting Sdn Bhd
Veras Research Sdn Bhd