Radiofrequency ablation following first-line transarterial chemoembolization for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria
© zhang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 9 May 2013
Accepted: 3 January 2014
Published: 10 January 2014
Recent studies suggest that a combination of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) may have theoretical advantages over TACE alone for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of radiofrequency ablation following first-line TACE treatment in the management of HCC beyond the Milan Criteria.
Forty-five patients who consecutively underwent RFA following first-line TACE treatment for HCC beyond the Milan criteria were enrolled in this study. RFA was performed within 1–2 months after TACE treatment in patients who had incomplete necrotic tumor nodules. Primary effectiveness, complications, survival rates, and prognostic factors were evaluated retrospectively.
Complete ablation was achieved in 76.2% of the lesions according to 1-month follow-up computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. The mean follow-up period was 30.9 months (range 3–94 months). There were no major complications after RFA therapy. The median overall survival was 29 months (range 20–38 months), with 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival of 89%, 61%, and 43%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor diameter (P = 0.045, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.228, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.054-0.968) and pretreatment serum alpha-fetoprotein level (P = 0.024, HR = 2.239, 95% CI: 1.114-4.500) were independent predictors for long-term survival.
HCC beyond the Milan criteria can be completely and safely ablated by radiofrequency ablation following first-line TACE treatment with a low rate of complications and favorable survival outcome. Further assessment of the survival benefits of combination treatment for HCCs beyond the Milan Criteria is warranted.
KeywordsHepatocellular carcinoma Radiofrequency ablation Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization Milan criteria
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide and the second most common in China [1, 2]. Despite increased early diagnosis of HCC as a result of surveillance of high-risk populations, only 30% of patients diagnosed with early stage HCC are candidates for curative therapies such as surgical resection or radiofrequency ablation . Moreover, the prognosis of patients with advanced or unresectable HCC remains unsatisfactory due to a low response rate and short time to progression. According to current treatment guidelines, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been established as the standard therapy for patients who are not eligible for curative therapies [4, 5]. Although the survival benefit of TACE treatment has been proved in two randomized clinical trials [5, 6], TACE has a primarily palliative effect and does not achieve complete tumor necrosis therefore tumor relapse after TACE is universal . Additionally, repetitive TACE treatments might damage liver function reserve and decrease survival time. Consequently, new strategies are needed to improve the effectiveness of TACE treatment for HCC patients.
Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been accepted as a curative therapy for small HCC, and can provide better local control of the disease than TACE treatment and a similar long-term survival to surgical resection. Previous studies have shown that RFA can achieve complete necrosis in more than 90% of small HCCs [8–10]. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of RFA treatment in patients with intermediate or large HCC is unsatisfactory, with a relatively low complete necrosis rate ranging from 29.0% to 70.0% even if overlapping ablation or repeated procedures are used [11–13]. Therefore, conventional RFA treatment was recommended only for patients with small HCCs confined to the Milan criteria .
Recent evidence has suggested that TACE combined with RFA may have a synergistic effect on ablation of HCC [15–17]. To date, few studies have investigated combination therapy of radiofrequency ablation following transarterial arterial chemoembolization for patients with unresectable HCC beyond the Milan criteria. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of such combination therapy for unresectable HCC.
Baseline characteristics of patients treated with RFA after first-line treatment with TACE
No. of patients (%)
Tumor diameter with ablation
TACE was performed using a standard procedure. Briefly, hepatic arteriography was performed to identify the feeding artery of the liver tumor. The catheter, usually a 4 F or 5 F RH catheter (Cook Co., USA), was inserted into the tumor feeding artery as close as possible to the tumor. Microcatheters (Terumo Co., Japan) were used to catheterize the feeding artery if needed. Chemotherapeutic agents [1000 mg 5-fluoruracil (5-FU), 80 mg cisplatin] were slowly infused followed by 5–30 ml lipiodol with 10 mg mitomycin-C emulsion for embolization. The regimen of chemoembolization was adjusted according to liver function and peripheral leukocyte or platelet levels. Gelatin was administered afterwards for additional embolization in cases with large hypervascular tumors.
Before RFA treatment, a dynamic contrast computed tomograph (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to evaluate the response after TACE and identify the target lesions to be treated with RFA. Disappearance of tumor enhancement in the arterial phase was considered complete necrosis and identified tumor nodules that were not targets for RFA. Only tumor nodules with contrast enhancement in arterial phase with CT or MRI evaluation were treated with RFA.
From February 2001 to September 2004, 16 patients were treated with RFA using the RFA 2000 (Radio-Therapeutic, USA) and a needle electrode with a 15-gauge insulated cannula and 10 hook-shaped expandable electrode tines with a diameter of 2.0 or 3.5 cm at expansion (Radio-Therapeutics,USA). From October 2004 to November 2009, 29 patients were treated with RFA using a 15-gauge multielectrode RF probe with an expansion of 2.0 or 3.5 cm (RITA, USA). The details of the treatment procedure are described in our previous studies . Briefly, RFA was performed by a percutaneous procedure under conscious sedation and local anesthesia. The RFA electrode was inserted into the tumor nodules under the guidance of ultrasonography. Overlap ablation was allowed to cover the whole tumor nodule and achieve an adequate safety margin of 0.5-1.0 cm.
Evaluation of ablation efficiency and follow-up
The ablation efficiency of RFA was evaluated after 1 month by dynamic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. Complete ablation (complete response [CR]) was defined as complete devascularization of the lesions during the arterial phase and no appearance of new tumors at other liver sites. Patients were monitored every 2 months after RFA by serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels and abdominal ultrasonography. Patients with test results suggestive of recurrence or metastasis received additional computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging. Patients with local incomplete ablation or residual disease in the remaining liver underwent a repeat RFA or chemoembolization.
Quantitative variables were expressed as means ± standard deviation or as medians. Qualitative variables were presented as numbers and percentages. Student’s t test was used to compare quantitative variables and the χ2 test was used for qualitative variables. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of TACE treatment to death or the last follow-up. Survival curves were constructed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards models. A difference was considered significant for P <0.05.
Efficiency of ablation
We evaluated a total of 147 tumor nodules in 45 patients (10 patients with single nodule; 11 with 2 nodules, 2 with 3 nodules, and 22 with 4–5 nodules). Among the 147 nodules, 84 were treated with the RFA procedure. The other 63 nodules were not treated with RFA because of complete necrosis presenting with complete lipiodol deposition and without artery contrast enhancement on CT or MRI after TACE treatment. For the ablated tumor lesions, 44 lesions were ≥50 mm and 40 lesions were <50 mm, with a median tumor diameter of 55.0 mm (range 20 mm to 80 mm) (Table 1).
Evaluation of factors affecting ablation efficiency
Local success (CR)
Two of 45 patients (4.4%) developed procedure-related major complications after RFA (one with local skin heat injury and one with gastrointestinal bleeding). No procedure-related deaths occurred. Minor complications such as nausea, fever, and post-treatment abdominal pain were observed in most patients but none required medical intervention.
Univariate analysis of prognostic factors in patients treated with RFA after first-line treatment with TACE
No. of patients (%)
Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in patients with RFA after first-line treatment with TACE
RFA has been widely used as a curative therapy for small HCC. The overall survival of patients with small HCC undergoing RFA is similar to that of patients receiving surgical Resection [8–10, 20, 21]. In clinical practice it is rarely possible to achieve complete ablation for tumors larger than 5 cm because of the limitation of the ablation zone [22, 23]. For patients with tumors beyond the Milan criteria, surgical treatment could be another curative option. If the tumor cannot be completely removed, palliative TACE treatment is the main treatment of choice. However, the long-term outcome for patients with unresectable HCC treated with TACE is unsatisfactory due to the inability to achieve complete tumor necrosis. Repeated TACE is often needed to completely eradicate the residual tumors, but its efficiency is limited and the rate of tumor recurrence or relapse after initial remission or stable disease is very high.
Several lines of evidence have indicated the feasibility and benefit of combination therapy of TACE and RFA. Buscarini et al. treated 14 HCC patients (with lesion size ranging from 3.8-6.8 cm, median 5.2 cm) with TACE followed by RFA. Their results suggested the possibility of treating large HCC with this procedure . Lencioni et al. similarly reported a successful outcome (82%) among patients with HCC (lesion size ranging between 3.8 and 8.5 cm) who were treated with TACE prior to RFA . Consistent with previous studies, the post-treatment CR rate of 76.2% and partial response rate of 23.8% in the present series indicate an encouraging benefit for patients with unresectable HCC beyond the Milan criteria.
RFA treatment following TACE has some advantages over TACE alone. Embolization during the TACE procedure can block arterial flow, which may reduce heat-sink effects during RFA thus increasing the volume of the zone of ablation and reducing the chance of tumor recurrence. TACE can also control or eliminate micro-metastasis, which cannot always be detected by ultrasonography, CT, or MRI. Thus, the addition of TACE may decrease the chance of micro-metastasis after RFA treatment in HCC patients with unresectable tumors beyond the Milan criteria.
With respect to prognostic factors correlated with local ablation efficiency, our results suggested that lesion diameter (< 50 mm vs. ≥ 50 mm) was statistically significant for predicting complete ablation (86.4% vs. 65%, P = 0.022). The presence of multiple lesions did not significantly affect complete ablation, although this might be because the number of nodules was confined to five in our study. It is difficult to completely destroy tumors larger than 5 cm by RFA despite multiple overlapping ablations; however, first-line TACE treatment might reduce the volume of viable tumor thus making complete ablation of the lesions possible. This treatment advantage was also proposed by Vogl, who suggested that repeated TACE might reduce the size of the treated lesions .
In this study, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 89%, 61%, and 43%, respectively. These rates are consistent with those of other studies. Veltri reported 1- and 2-year survival rates of 89.7% and 67.1% for TACE-RFA combined therapy for unresectable non-early HCC (size 30–80 mm, mean 48.9 mm) . Similarly, Liao et al.  administrated TACE followed by RFA in the treatment of unresectable HCC (size 30–120 mm, mean 58.9 mm) with 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates of 84%, 57%, and 38%, respectively. Our multivariate analysis showed that tumor size and serum AFP level before treatment were prognostic factors for overall survival. A high pretreatment level of AFP has previously been reported to be associated with poorer survival, reflecting not only tumor cell proliferation but also active disease with continuous necrosis and regeneration [29, 30].
We found that TACE-RFA combined therapy had a low rate of major complications. No permanent adverse sequelae or treatment-related deaths were observed. Thus, combination therapy of TACE followed by RFA appears to be relatively safe.
In conclusion, our results indicate that combination therapy of TACE with RFA is safe and effective, and can achieve a favorable long-term outcome in unresectable HCC beyond the Milan criteria. The major limitation of this study was its retrospective nature and non-randomized design. Further prospective randomized studies are warranted to confirm the efficacy of this promising combination therapy.
Magnetic resonance imaging
Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.
This study was supported by a grant from the Zhongshan Hospital Clinical Research Development Program. We thank Xiaomei yang at Cancer Liver Institute for the data collection and Weizhong Chen at radiology department for providing imaging information.
- Ding SJ, Li Y, Tan YX, Jiang MR, Tian B, Liu YK, Shao XX, Ye SL, Wu JR, Zeng R, Wang HY, Tang ZY, Xia QC: From proteomic analysis to clinical significance: overexpression of cytokeratin 19 correlates with hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2004, 3: 73-81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Altekruse SF, McGlynn KA, Reichman ME: Hepatocellular carcinoma incidence, mortality, and survival trends in the United States from 1975 to 2005. J Clin Oncol. 2009, 27: 1485-1491. 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.7753.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sangiovanni A, Del Ninno E, Fasani P, De F, Ronchi G, Romeo R, Morabito A, De Franchis R, Colombo M: Increased survival of cirrhotic patients with a hepatocellular carcinoma detected during surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2004, 126: 1005-1014. 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.12.049.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Llovet JM, Real MI, Montana X, Planas R, Coll S, Aponte J, Ayuso C, Sala M, Muchart J, Sola R, Rodes J, Bruix J: Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patient with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2002, 359: 1734-1739. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08649-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lo CM, Nqan H, Tso WK, Liu CL, Lam CM, Poon RT, Fan ST, Wong J: Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2002, 35: 1164-1167. 10.1053/jhep.2002.33156.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Llovet JM, Bruix J: Systematic review of randomize trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology. 2003, 37: 429-442. 10.1053/jhep.2003.50047.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jansen MC, van Hillegersberg R, Chamuleau RA, van Delden OM, Gouma DJ, van Guilk TM: Outcome of regional and local ablative therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: a collective review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005, 31: 331-347. 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.10.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McGahan JF, Dodd GD: Radiofrequency ablation of the liver: current status. Am J Roentgenol. 2001, 176: 3-16. 10.2214/ajr.176.1.1760003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lencioni R, Allgaier HP, Cioni D, Olschewski M, Deibert P, Crocetti L, Fring H, Laubenberger J, Zuber I, Blum HE, Bartolozzi C: Small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: randomized comparison of radio-frequency thermal ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection. Radiology. 2003, 228: 235-240. 10.1148/radiol.2281020718.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buscarini L, Buscarini E, Di Stasi M, Vallisa D, Quaretti P, Rocca A: Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of small hepatocellular carcinoma: long term results. Eur Radiol. 2001, 11: 914-921. 10.1007/s003300000659.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Livraghi T, Goldberg SN, Lazzaroni S, Meloni F, Ierace T, Solbiati L, Gazelle GS: Hepatocellular carcinoma: radio-frequency ablation of medium and large lesions. Radiology. 2000, 214: 761-768. 10.1148/radiology.214.3.r00mr02761.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dupuy DE, Goldberg SN: Image-guided radiofrequency tumor ablation: challenges and opportunities–part II. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001, 12: 1135-1148. 10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61670-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Curley SA: Radiofrequency ablation of malignant liver tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003, 10: 338-347. 10.1245/ASO.2003.07.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hsu CY, Huang YH, Chiou YY, Su CW, Lin HC, Lee RC, Chiang JH, Huo TI, Lee FY, Lee SD: Comparison of radiofrequency ablation and transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan Criteria: A propensity score analysis. Liver Transpl. 2011, 17: 556-566. 10.1002/lt.22273.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peng ZW, Chen MS, Liang HH, Gao HJ, Zhang YJ, Li JQ, Zhang YQ, Lau WY: A case–control study comparing percutaneous radiofrequency ablation alone or combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010, 36: 257-263. 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.07.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takaki H, Yamakado K, Uraki J, Nakatsuka A, Fuke H, Yamamoto N, Shiraki K, Yamada T, Takeda K: Radiofrequency ablation combined with chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinomas larger than 5 cm. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009, 20: 217-224. 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.10.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kirikoshi H, Saito S, Yoneda M, Fujita K, Mawatari H, Uchiyama T, Higurashi T, Goto A, Takahashi H, Abe Y, Inamori M, Kobayashi N, Kubota K, Sakaguchi T, Ueno N, Nakajima A: Outcome of transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy, and in combination with percutaneous ethanol injection, or radiofrequency ablation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res. 2009, 39: 553-562. 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2009.00490.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bruix J, Sherman M: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology. 2011, 53: 1020-1022. 10.1002/hep.24199.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yang B, Zou J, Xia J, Ren Z, Gan Y, Wang Y, Zhang B, Ge N, Wang D, Chen Y, Chen R, Li L, Ye S, Wang X: Risk factors for recurrence of small hepatocellular carcinoma after long-term follow-up of precutaneous radiofrequency ablation. Eur J Radiol. 2011, 79: 196-200. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.02.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lau WY, Leung TW, Yu SC, Ho SK: Percutaneous local ablative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a review and look into the future. Ann Surg. 2003, 237: 171-179.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- de Baere T, Elias D, Dromain C, Din MG, Kuoch V, Ducreux M, Boige V, Lassau N, Marteau V, Lasser P, Roche A: Radiofrequency ablation of 100 hepatic metastases with a mean follow-up of more than 1 year. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000, 175: 1619-1625. 10.2214/ajr.175.6.1751619.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamasaki T, Kurokawa F, Shirahashi H, Kusano N, Hironaka K, Okita K: Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma during occlusion of hepatic blood flow. Comparison with standard percutaneous radiofrequency ablation therapy. Cancer. 2002, 95: 2353-2360. 10.1002/cncr.10966.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rossi S, Garbagnati F, De Francesco I, Accocella F, Leonardi L, Quaretti P, Zangrandi A, Paties C, Lencioni R: Relationship between the shape and size of radiofrequency-induced thermal lesions and hepatic vascularization. Tumori. 1999, 85: 128-132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buscarini L, Buscarini E, Di Stasi M, Quaretti P, Zangrandi A: Percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation combined with transcatheter arterial embolization in the treatment of large hepatocellular carcinoma. Ultraschall Med. 1999, 20: 47-53. 10.1055/s-1999-14233.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lencioni R, Cioni D, Donati F, Bartolozzi C: Combination of interventional therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 2001, 48: 8-14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vogl TJ, Mack MG, Balzer JO, Engelmann K, Straub R, Eichler K, Woitaschek D, Zangos S: Liver metastases: neoadjuvant downsizing with trans-arterial chemoembolization before laser-induced thermotheraphy. Radiology. 2003, 229: 457-464. 10.1148/radiol.2292021329.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Veltri A, Moretto P, Doriguzzi A, Pagano E, Carrara G, Gandini G: Radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as a combined therapy for unresectable non-early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Eur Radiol. 2006, 16: 661-669. 10.1007/s00330-005-0029-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liao GS, Yu CY, Shih ML, Chan DC, Liu YC, Yu JC, Chen TW, Hsieh CB: Radiofrequency ablation after transarterial embolization as therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008, 34: 61-66. 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.02.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stuart KE, Anand AJ, Jennins RL: Hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. Cancer. 1996, 77: 2217-2222. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960601)77:11<2217::AID-CNCR6>3.0.CO;2-M.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mondazzi L, Bottelli R, Brambilla G, Rampoldi A, Rezakovic I, Zavaglia C, Alberti A, Ideo G: Transarterial oily chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma:A multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. Hepatology. 1994, 19: 1115-1123. 10.1002/hep.1840190508.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/14/11/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.