Interprovider variation of celiac disease testing in childhood chronic abdominal pain
© Chumpitazi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 12 September 2012
Accepted: 2 October 2013
Published: 14 October 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|12 Sep 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Bruno Chumpitazi|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - steven werlin|
|21 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Craig Friesen|
|1 Jul 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Bruno Chumpitazi|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|1 Jul 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Jul 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Bruno Chumpitazi|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|2 Jul 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|2 Oct 2013||Editorially accepted|
|14 Oct 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-230X-13-150|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.