A case of rectal tumor in which the shape altered with regression in short period
- Fumihiko Nakamura†1, 2,
- Taku Sakamoto†1,
- Takeshi Nakajima1,
- Yutaka Saito1,
- Hirokazu Taniguchi3 and
- Takahisa Matsuda†1Email author
© Nakamura et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 17 February 2013
Accepted: 25 September 2013
Published: 3 October 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|17 Feb 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ulrich Keilholz|
|26 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charles LeVea|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Aug 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Fumihiko Nakamura|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Aug 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|4 Aug 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Fumihiko Nakamura|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|4 Aug 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|25 Sep 2013||Editorially accepted|
|3 Oct 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-230X-13-146|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.