Erythromycin versus neomycin in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis: a randomized double-blind study
© Romeiro et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 2 May 2012
Accepted: 12 January 2013
Published: 16 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mariano Malaguarnera|
|23 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Felix Gundling|
|9 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Fernando Romeiro|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Felix Gundling|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|12 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|16 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-230X-13-13|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.