Percutaneous ultrasonographically guided liver punctures: an analysis of 1961 patients over a period of ten years
- Michael Mueller†1,
- Wolfgang Kratzer†1Email author,
- Suemeyra Oeztuerk1,
- Manfred Wilhelm2,
- Richard Andrew Mason3,
- Ren Mao4 and
- Mark Martin Haenle1
© Mueller et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 3 April 2012
Accepted: 29 November 2012
Published: 5 December 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Apr 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|24 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthias J. Bahr|
|17 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Holger Lutz|
|25 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Wolfgang Kratzer|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Holger Lutz|
|15 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthias J. Bahr|
|19 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Wolfgang Kratzer|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|5 Dec 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-230X-12-173|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.