Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Patients’ perspectives of living with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG)

BMC Gastroenterology201212:126

DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-126

Received: 3 May 2012

Accepted: 27 August 2012

Published: 18 September 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 May 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Simon Rogers
28 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rupert Leong
29 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Sanders
8 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Lena Martin
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Simon Rogers
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
27 Aug 2012 Editorially accepted
18 Sep 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-230X-12-126

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Unit of Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet
(2)
Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Karolinska University Hospital
(3)
Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Karolinska University Hospital

Advertisement